Foreign buyers snap up R9.7 billion worth of prime residential property in South Africa

Posted On Friday, 28 November 2014 18:41 Published by
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Foreign buyers of prime residential property have made a return to the South African market.

Lured by attractive homes at equally attractive prices, relative political stability, wonderful climate and a currency which is very much in their favour, these buyers hail from across the globe. Europeans are prominent, but buyers from African countries – East, Central and West - are growing in numbers.

Recently this market, which had dwindled during the global recession, has revived. Over the past 12 months or so the purchase value of South African property bought by foreigners totalled R9.7 billion. Of these, 53 percent were cash sales and 47 percent bonded (foreigners may borrow up to a maximum of 50 percent). Of 280 395 registrations between 2013 and 2014, tracked by property analysts Lightstone, 8 530 were to foreign buyers.

This is an important number in terms of this country’s need of foreign direct investment and this inflow is often shrugged off by detractors of foreign property ownership. Yet the government report in 2007 by the Panel of Experts on the Development of Policy regarding Land Ownership by Foreigners in South Africa, noted that the UK has no restrictions on foreign ownership, commenting that such ownership “is in fact encouraged in order to attract direct foreign investment.” 

What appears frequently to be ignored is the fact that the buying and selling of residential property is a two-way street which applies to all involved, whether they be foreigners or locals. As an example, over the period mentioned above, during which foreigners bought properties worth R9.7 billion, foreign owners were net sellers in the market. These sales totalled R11.3 billion.

There appears to be a similar lack of understanding of the term land when the issue is reform, redistribution, dominant white ownership, or foreign buyers. Are we talking about basic land itself or developed land? Developed to what extent? Farms, factories, office blocks, apartments, houses, private clinics, old age homes, private estates? Should we be saying to foreign investors “Do come in and build a nice aluminium plant but don’t think of buying yourself a house?”

The foreign ownership bogey appears to derive from the wide misconception that, due to the exceptional buying opportunities in our residential property market, non-South Africans are buying up all our best homes in the choicest spots. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Current statistics – not based on surveys but on Deeds Office records - show that foreigners own some three percent of total land property in South Africa. In the UK the statistic is 15 percent.

Government does have a problem with land redistribution. Its efforts to buy (mainly rural) properties on the “willing seller, willing buyer” basis have waned – due partly to lack of funds, and of a lack of “willing” sellers. As a result, the government’s land reform programme, by which it hoped to transfer a third of all farmland to black hands by the end of this year, has failed.

The deadline for land claims has expired, but the government believes that some 400 000 land claims could still be lodged and President Zuma has signed into law the Restitution of Land Rights Amendment Act which opens a five-year window for the lodgement of further land claims. The government also wants to legislate to enable the expropriation of land without compensation if it has been acquired illegally or is used for illegal purposes. Neglected urban land may also come into the arena. As such, these laws will come with some slippery definitions. One man’s abandoned land, for instance, could be another’s fynbos paradise.

Minister for Rural Development and Land Reform Gugile Nkwinti has come up with a compromise plan to speed up rural redistribution – to introduce a leasehold option, with a minimum lease of 30 years. Singapore has a similar leasehold policy applicable to land for industrial purposes. It also has restrictions on land size which can be bought by foreigners.

Land reform issues obviously are not exclusive to South Africa. The 2007 Report noted that Chile is concerned about vast land tracts owned by foreigners and is taking measures to adjust this. In Indonesia, the 2007 Report noted, foreigners may not own freehold properties.

The recent “Yes or No” Freedom Referendum in Scotland re-opened many old sores on the issue of land ownership.  Until 2000 the country’s land tenure laws were feudal. Eight centuries after the reign of King Robert the Bruce, of Scotland’s total land acreage of 19.5 million, just over 10 million acres belong to 1550 private landowners and estates.

Research by Andy Wightman, land rights campaigner and author of The Poor Had No Lawyers , claims that 432 people own 50 percent of rural Scotland.

The surge of nationalism in Scotland, which has grown since the Referendum, has forced the government to introduce new or proposed legislation, such as giving communities an extension of the Right to Buy (practically all land), whether the owner wants to sell or not; a Land and Building Transactions Tax, which will target the top end; an upper limit to the amount any one owner can hold; changes to the law of succession and a whole range of measures to ensure that one million acres of land are in community ownership by 2020.

For some time now, Scotland has been a frontline favourite of foreign property buyers, particularly the ultra-wealthy seeking hunting, fishing and shooting estates in the Highlands. But this year potential buyers recognised that the possibility of a new, self-governing Scotland came with political risk. . Buying went into limbo.

The reaction to the possibility of widespread change illustrates how delicate and vulnerable the real estate market can be on the issue of property rights. We in South Africa should take note. There is little doubt that in terms of land restitution wrongs must be righted and the dispossessed compensated. But alarmist statements can do more harm than good.

Source: PGP

Last modified on Sunday, 30 November 2014 18:25

Most Popular

GMI Property Group adds a New Mall to its Stable: Bronkhorstspruit Mall

Jul 21, 2022
GMI Properties Group announces the development of the much-anticipated Bronkhorstspruit…

Equites Property Fund and Mabel conclude B-BBEE transaction

Jul 21, 2022
Andrea Taverna-Turisan
The JSE listed specialist logistics property fund, Equites, today officially announced…

Broad commercial property market softening expected due to ongoing and more rapid rate of interest rate hiking

Jul 21, 2022
Default Image
The still-bigger 75 basis point hike announced this afternoon, after the previous 125…

The rapidly rising cost of living is reflecting in residential rentals

Jul 21, 2022
TPN Graph-Rental Demand
Demand for residential rental properties saw some recovery in the first quarter of 2022…

Sky City Mall: We’re expecting our horizons in 2022

Jul 21, 2022
We’re moving forward with changes driven by the convergence of pandemic and longstanding…

Please publish modules in offcanvas position.